Hints for finding error in your experiment
None of the experiments you do in physics will yield perfect answers.
One of the main points the labs are trying to show you is how to interpret
and explain imperfect answers.
You should be able to answer the following questions about ALL
the data you collect in each of the labs you do this semester:
These are all questions that can be answered by using the statistical formulas
given in Appendix A of your lab book. If you want to know more,
the book 'Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical' Sciences
by P. R. Bevinton and D. K. Robinson (McGraw Hill,1992) is a good place
to start.
Is my data any good?
-
Precision tells you how much spread there is in your data and indicates
how carefully you did the experiment. Precision is reported as a confidence
limit which is determined from the standard deviation.
-
Accuracy (reported in your lab write up as relative error)
measures how far the mean of a set of data points is from the accepted
or true value.
-
So if you make very careful measurements with a bent meter stick, your
measurements will be precise (a small confidence limit) but not accurate
(large relative error).
Can I throw this data point out?
-
Use a Q-test to see if you can throw out a point. You only apply
a Q-test once to a set of data. Do not use a Q-test on data you are going
to graph.
Is this value close enough to this other value to be able to say they are
equal?
Suppose you have a value of 10.3 meters with a confidence limit of
±0.2 meters. So the measured value is between 10.1m and 10.5m. Now
suppose you get a second set of data by another method for the same measurement
(you think they are suppose to be equal). This second set gives you a reported
value of 10.4m ± 0.2m. Have you proved that the values are the same?
Well, the range on the second set goes from 10.2m to 10.6m so it overlaps
the range of the first set. So yes you can conclude that the two measurements
give the same result (at least to the precision of your results).
Which of the measurements that I have made are most likely to cause the
biggest error in my answer and how do I know?
In several early experiments this semester you calculate the angle
of an incline by measuring the height of one end and the length and use
trigonometry. For example suppose you measure a height of 3cm and an lenght
of 99cm. Using inverse sine you get an angle of 1.736o. Now
suppose you missed the 99cm by 1cm so that the true value is 100cm. In
that case the angle is 1.719o. You have a relative error of
1% between these answers. Now suppose the height is off by 1cm so that
the true value is 4cm. This gives an answer of 2.316o with a
relative error of 28%. Obviously you will want to measure the height much
more carefully than the length in order to avoid error in the angle. This
is true in many experiments: The acuracy of some measurements affect
your outcome more than others. You should always try to determine
if this is true in every lab and if so, report which measurements are
more critical and why (give a sample calculation like the one above).
Should I make a graph of my data?
A graph is used when the data is expected to change for each
measurement. Suppose you measure the height of the same tree every year
in a biology experiment. You do not expect to get the same answer each
year, so it would not make any sense to find the average of the numbers
you collected nor does it make sense to find a confidence limit or do a
Q test because each value is suppose to be different. (Notice that the
formulas in part I above are useful only when the data is expected
to be very close to a constant value. Do not use those formulas for data
on a graph!)
All graphs should be done with a computer program for graphing or
graphing calculator. No hand drawn graphs will be accepted for any lab.
Most of the graphs for this lab will be straight line graphs. In the micro
computing labs on campus there are copies of the program called Graphical
Analysis which is available for both Apple and Windows computers. You may
use other graphing programs as long as they will do a linear regression
(least square) fit (no pie charts please!). You may also use your TI-82/85/86
to do the regression line and print the screen
in PS100.
Physics at IUS: http://physics.ius.edu/
Contact Dr. K. Forinash,
for comments/suggestions/corrections.